Will Salem Mayor Anna Peterson admit she spoke falsely?

This is Day 1 of the Mayor Anna Peterson apology/retraction watch. No response yet to the email I sent her, with a cc to the Salem City Council. 

Mayor Peterson

I said what I did after listening to Peterson make a preachy, inaccurate mini-speech during a testy exchange at last night's City Council meeting.

She was fighting mad about the calm, reasoned, truthful things architect Geoffrey James was saying during the public comment period about the City's overpriced $80 million proposal for a new police facility at the Civic Center and renovations to City Hall.

Councillor Laura Tesler, seemingly operating from a script of attempted "gotcha" questions, had flamed out on her desperate attempt to challenge James' credentials and expertise. James handled his answers with aplomb and courtesy.

Unlike Tesler. And then, Peterson.

I couldn't believe that Mayor Peterson was actually claiming that the process used to select the Civic Center as the best location for a new police facility had been open to public view, and offered citizens good opportunities to weigh in on the decision.

Here's how the Statesman Journal reported it in "Salem City Council faces critics of new Civic Center."

James also recommended considering alternative locations for the police department as a cost-saving measure, and Peterson countered by saying the city looked at 16 alternative locations.

“I want to dispel what I’m hearing that we have not been open; that we have not been available to the public,” Peterson said. “This is not a city council or a city government that lightheartedly drew up plans.”

I knew this was untrue, having put quite a bit of time and effort into learning how the City decided to build a new police facility at the Civic Center. 

So here's what I said to Mayor Peterson and the City Council this morning. I gave the message a subject line of "Your unfactual message last night":

Mayor Peterson, sitting in the audience at last night’s City Council meeting, I found your statement about the City’s supposed openness about the police facility siting decision to be disturbing for several reasons.

(1) You delivered your comments in a preachy tone unbecoming for a public servant who is addressing members of the public with valid concerns about a $128 million (including financing costs) project. So your style was inappropriate.
 
(2) Your statement was factually incorrect. So the substance of what you said was inappropriate.
 
I’ve spent considerable time researching how the siting decision was made. After writing up the results of my research, I sent it to Courtney Knox Busch, the lead staff person for this project. I asked her to correct any mistakes in my conclusions. She didn’t respond, so I must assume that what I concluded is correct.
 
To quote myself:

"The City of Salem decided to build a new police facility at the Civic Center without any public hearings or public discussion. City staff and the Mayor made this decision." 

A fairly lengthy blog post contains the basis for this conclusion. Read all about it here:
 
I believe an apology and retraction is in order. The Mayor of Salem shouldn't use the City Council podium as a soapbox for spreading inaccurate information. This degrades trust in City government, which already is low.
 
Like the saying goes, we all are entitled to our own opinions, but not to our own facts. I have done my best to uncover the facts about how the City made a decision to site a new police facility at the Civic Center. I’ve asked City staff to correct any misunderstandings I might have. None were pointed out.
 
If you have new information to share on this issue, please send it to me with appropriate factual documentation. Otherwise I will continue to assume that what I said is true: "The City of Salem decided to build a new police facility at the Civic Center without any public hearings or public discussion. City staff and the Mayor made this decision.” 
 
    — Brian Hines
 
Unlike officals at the City of Salem, I'm pleased to admit when I've been proven wrong. So I look forward to getting more information from the Mayor's Office about how marvelously open the siting decison was, and how the City reached out to the public early on so they could be involved in the decision-making process.
 
Today is Day 1. No response yet. But tomorrow is another day.

Discover more from Hinessight

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *