Black walnut deaths point to more Salem tree dysfunction

Salem, Oregon is steadily strengthening its reputation as the city where public officials are either incompetent or uncaring when it comes to our trees. 

Today I talked with an anonymous reputable source (love that term! makes me sound like an investigative blogger!) who told me some disturbing tales about the black walnut trees being cut down on the State Hospital campus. 

Black-walnut-tree

A black walnut tree

Here's an excerpt from a recent Statesman Journal story by Tracy Loew, "Historic Salem trees felled due to new disease."

Six century-old black walnut trees on the Oregon State Hospital campus are being felled this week due to infection with thousand cankers disease.

The disease already has forced the removal of 15 historic black walnut trees at the hospital, and has infected 32 more that eventually will come down as well.

And, it’s spreading into the surrounding neighborhood. Experts say the disease could eventually kill all of Salem’s black walnuts.

To everybody who loves trees, this is bad news. But there's more to the story. Here's what I was told by Mr./Ms. Reputable Source.

The trees are on state property. But a required Notification Permit wasn't obtained prior to the removal work by R & R Tree Service. (My source knows all about this permit; I don't; it might relate to this.)

The State Forester confirmed that the required permit is lacking. With no permit, the mill that is getting the black walnut remains shouldn't accept the wood.

Even more disturbing, the fungus infection reportedly has been known to tree officials for three or four years. I assume this includes Salem's Urban Forester, Jan Staszewski. Yet nothing, or not enough, was done to control the infection.

Now many other black walnut trees in the area near the State Hospital have been infected. Partly, I heard today, this was due to inadequate trimming work, and maybe also poor planning by whoever requested the work.

Reportedly the trimming was delayed for several months.

So I was told that most of the leaves on the black walnuts were down by the time the trimming of infected limbs occurred. This made it difficult to identify the infected parts of the tree. By spring it was obvious that many infected areas had been missed, allowing the fungus infection to spread to other black walnuts. 

I also recall my Reputable Source saying that there was a problem with how wood from diseased trees was handled. If my scribbled note is correct, this had something to do with chipping the wood before infected material was separated from normal wood.

Now, the handling of the black walnuts on the State Hospital property is just one of many instances where trees have been, and are, being cared for poorly in Salem. I've documented this in numerous blog posts, including here, here, and here.

It's also disturbing that this is the second time in just a few months that required permits haven't been obtained before trees have been cut down on the State Hospital property.

Back in September I asked City of Salem officials why a large red oak was removed prior to the appeal deadline — which obviously prevented concerned citizens from challenging the decision to cut down the tree.

Below is the response I got from the Interim City Manager. He said that the State Department of Administrative Services (DAS) was hit with a $250 fine for removing the tree prematurely.

This may not seem like a big deal. But taken in the context of how many other questionable tree removals have been happening in Salem, it's understandable why tree-loving citizens are dubious about how committed City and State officials are to caring for our leafy friends.

Hello Brian,

Our Community Development Department has provided me some information about your inquiry. Mr. Fernandez and Atchison do not have dealings with this matter as the tree is property owned by the State of Oregon, not the City of Salem. 

The Yaquina Hall tree was removed by the State of Oregon after an Administrative Decision was issued to authorize removal of the tree due to safety concerns. The tree was reported to be damaged and unsound; the condition was confirmed by our Urban Forester, Jan Staszewski.

The City was informed by neighbors that the removal of the tree took place prior to the end of the appeal period on the decision. The City contacted the Department of Administrative Services to discuss the matter. Staff at DAS indicated they were unaware that removal had taken place prematurely. 

Staff took the opportunity to explain the appeal process and help identify the appeal date on the decision. The action was determined to not be a tree violation under SRC Chapter 808 and was investigated as process violation under SRC Chapter 110.  DAS provided assurance about future compliance and agreed to pay a $250 fine for the inadvertent violation.
 
Kacey Duncan
Interim City Manager
City of Salem, Oregon

Discover more from Hinessight

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 Comments

  1. Jack Holloway

    This could not possibly have anything to do with the fact that black walnut wood can sell for as much as $400 a board foot, could it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *