I thought it would take a little longer, but after just one day of John Boehner's Republicans taking control of the House I'm already seriously sick from their crazed commitment to repealing 2010's hard-won health care reform legislation.
The craziness starts with the name they've given to H.R. 2, inaccurately termed “Repealing the Job Killing Health Care Act.” Actually the facts are exactly opposite — which is common with the truth-killing B.S. Republicans like to spew.
Here's what is genuinely job-killing: the hugely inefficient and ineffective American health care non-system, which costs businesses and individuals double what other industrialized nations pay, and gives us poorer results.
A paper on "Healthcare costs and U.S. competitiveness" discusses the burden this places on companies that have to compete with overseas firms enjoying much lower labor costs.
The United States spends an estimated $2 trillion annually on healthcare expenses, more than any other industrialized country. According to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United States spends two-and-a-half times more than the OECD average, and yet ranks with Turkey and Mexico as the only OECD countries without universal health coverage. Some analysts say an increasing number of U.S. businesses are less competitive globally because of ballooning healthcare costs.
…Some economists say these ballooning dollar figures place a heavy burden on companies doing business in the United States and can put them at a substantial competitive disadvantage in the international marketplace. For large multinational corporations, footing healthcare costs presents an enormous expense. General Motors, for instance, covers more than 1.1 million employees and former employees, and the company says it spends roughly $5 billion on healthcare expenses annually. GM says healthcare costs add between $1,500 and $2,000 to the sticker price of every automobile it makes.
Sure, the cost control aspect of the health care reform bill, a.k.a. "Obamacare," doesn't go far enough. But by insuring tens of millions of additional Americans, the cost of the charity (uncompensated) care they get now won't be passed on by health care providers to those with private insurance — as it is currently.
And there are numerous provisions in Obamacare which stand a good chance of bending the health care cost curve downward. Encouraging studies of what sorts of medical care are most effective, for one; promoting electronic medical records, for two.
Indeed, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) concluded that Obamacare will reduce the federal deficit by $230 billion over the next ten years. Conversely, of course, that's how much the deficit will increase if the Republicans had their repeal way (which they won't, thankfully, owing to a Democratic Senate and President).
"But wait," you may be thinking, "how can this be when Republicans campaigned in the mid-terms on a promise of fiscal responsibility and deficit reduction?" Good question.
Now we're learning the answer.
Boehner and company aren't serious about these goals; they simply wanted to make empty promises in order to fool voters into choosing "R" over "D." This is why the House Republicans are ignoring the Congressional Budget Office figures which show that Obamacare will reduce the deficit substantially.
House Speaker John Boehner said today that the Congressional Budget Office is "entitled to their own opinion" – a striking statement in light of the deference usually shown information from the nonpartisan CBO from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
Boehner was objecting to a preliminary CBO finding that repealing the health care reform legislation, as Boehner's House GOP plans to vote to do, would cost the government roughly $230 billion over ten years.
CBS News asked Boehner whether that finding prompted concern that he is sending a signal that he is not serious about addressing the debt and deficit when "the first major legislative action you take will increase the debt."
The Daily Kos has a great post that documents how much deference Republicans gave to the CBO in the past. But since truthiness is their watchword — facts and reality are whatever they want them to be, even if people are dying and taxes are wasted – the House Republicans are embracing hypocrisy and hoping citizens won't notice.
Well, I am. And I'm sickened by what they're doing.
Keep your damn hands off of my health care reform, Boehner! I've got no interest in giving greedy private insurance companies any more power than they already have to interfere with medical decisions that should be the province of a person and his/her physican.
Read "When Insurers Put Profits Between Doctor and Patient," which describes how an evil insurance company sentenced a 17 year old girl to death by denying coverage for her liver transplant.
This shows that Obamacare isn't any sort of danger to our health. It's our current health care system. The sooner it gets reformed, the better — for both our wellbeing and our pocketbook.
Discover more from Hinessight
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

These are the people that Obama sold out to on taxes — because we needed to be “bi-partisan.” Yeah, right.
Why are you falling into the Republican meme trap of terming the health care bill “Obamacare”?
It is the “Affordable Care Act of 2010”, which is why my insurance premiums were raised by my insurance company by 37% on January 1st. The insurance companies are squeezing us for every penny they can before they have less ability to do so if they want to compete. Republicans seem to have no problems with 37% premium hikes.
Daniel, I used to call the legislation “health care reform bill,” or such. But then I realized that a big part of my motivation for doing so was, as you said, that critics of the bill were calling it “Obamacare.”
As if that was something bad, something to be ashamed about — that Obama was behind it.
I’ve come to the conclusion that progressives/Democrats should embrace the term “Obamacare.” We should be proud that President Obama championed this legislation, while recognizing that it is imperfect and needs to be improved.
Hopefully more and more Americans will come to realize how many good things are in the reform legislation, and what our country would lose if the Republicans succeeded in repealing it. Then, “Obamacare” will become even more of a positive term, and perhaps even a key to his reelection in 2012.
“The Greatest Country On Earth”? No where else in any other “non third world” country do you have to worry that if you get sick or hurt, do you go broke and lose everything. Boehner makes everyone with a brain sick. Thanks for the post.
I completely disagree. “Obamacare” is solidly associated with everything opponents see as an overreach of government and Obama’s supposed socialist agenda. No amount of repeating the word will co-opt the term and associate it will a positive spin. It continues to put the focus on Obama, and not on what the bill is about: covering 32 million more Americans and providing consumer protections against an insurance industry that has run amok.
Politifact.com has named the Republican claims that the affordable health care plan is a “Government Takeover” as the ** 2010 Lie of the Year **. Rep. Steve Cohen discussed the Politifact finding on the House floor and rightly admonished John Boehner’s Bible thumping Republicans for “Bearing False Witness”
See it here: http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/jan/07/lie-year-generates-more-discussion/
I am starting to conclude that Republicans *ONLY* lie; they never seem to say anything factual that is of any use to the country.
Case in point, their “job crushing” (formerly job killing) numbers.
From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/18/boehner-job-killing-health-care_n_810298.html
“What follows is a story of how statistics get used and abused in Washington.
What CBO actually said is that the impact of the health care law on supply and demand for labor would be small. Most of it would come from people who no longer have to work, or can downshift to less demanding employment, because insurance will be available outside the job.”
Repeat: *** People who feel they have to work now to get health insurance can get health insurance on their own outside of a job, so they will no longer feel forced to work ***
Republican translation:
“The legislation, on net, will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by a small amount _roughly half a percent_ primarily by reducing the amount of labor that workers CHOOSE to supply,” budget office number crunchers said in a report from last year.
That’s not how it got translated in the new report from Boehner and other top Republicans.
CBO “has determined that the law will reduce the ‘amount of labor used in the economy by.roughly half a percent.,’ an estimate that adds up to roughly 650,000 jobs lost,” the GOP version said.”
Repeat: **** Republicans translated jobs left because workers no longer feel forced to work to jobs lost, which is a lie ****
Where is the Republican plan to increase jobs in the United States?